Our student Kiran passed her road test in first go. We are very proud of our instructor Satpal and student Kiran for clearing the test in first attempt. Congratulations To Kiran !!!
Well IPv4 and IPv6 are mutually exclusive Yes, you can run “dual-stack” on your systems (support for both), but it will come laced with problems that are out of your control Dual-stacking was the worst possible idea for IPv6 and that’s the reason it will NEVER get 100 adoption I appreciate that an IPv4 address can be written as “::127001” (for backward compatibility) but it should have stopped there As long as my system supports both protocols concurrently, something will fail and it will cause more headaches than anything for any and all admins That should have been left for routers only, where a router would always rewrite “IPv4” connections from 19216801 to ::19216801 and then forward the traffic to IPv6-only hosts As long as we hold onto IPv4, we’re stuck with this abomination
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
hemen sesi yaziya cevirin ve dinlemekle ugrasmayin
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.
Well IPv4 and IPv6 are mutually exclusive Yes, you can run “dual-stack” on your systems (support for both), but it will come laced with problems that are out of your control Dual-stacking was the worst possible idea for IPv6 and that’s the reason it will NEVER get 100 adoption I appreciate that an IPv4 address can be written as “::127001” (for backward compatibility) but it should have stopped there As long as my system supports both protocols concurrently, something will fail and it will cause more headaches than anything for any and all admins That should have been left for routers only, where a router would always rewrite “IPv4” connections from 19216801 to ::19216801 and then forward the traffic to IPv6-only hosts As long as we hold onto IPv4, we’re stuck with this abomination
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.